Friday, January 24, 2020
Drug Testing in the Workplace Essay -- Pre-Employment Drug Testing
     Drug testing has become a very big issue for many companies. Approximately eighty-one percent of companies in the United States administer drug testing to their employees. Of these, seventy-seven percent of companies test employees prior to employment. Even with the commonality of drug testing, it is still a practice that is generally limited to larger corporations which have the financial stability, as well as the human resources to effectively carry out a drug testing program. In the United States, it is suggested that as many as 70 percent of drug users are employed. Now this is a huge chunk, but as a result of drug testing, these big corporations have a significantly lower percentage of the employed drug users on their workforce. Inversely, medium to smaller companies tend to have more. United States companies, who employ more than five hundred workers, employ only 1.3 percent of the employed drug users, while medium size companies, employing only twenty-five to five hundred employees, have 43 percent of the employed drug users on their payroll, and smaller companies, with fewer than twenty-five employees, provide jobs for the remaining 44 percent.      Now, why is it important for companies to perform drug tests? First, drug users are a third less productive than the average employee, and tend to take more sick days. They are almost four times more likely to cause an on the job accident and injure themselves as well as someone else. They are also five times more likely to injure themselves outside of the workplace, which in turn affects both performance and attendance. Now I?m sure almost everyone can attest to the fact that drugs, including alcohol can cause some serious injuries. A study by the United States Postal Service found that substance abusers, when compared to their non-substance abusing co-workers, are involved in 55 percent more accidents, and sustain 85 percent more on-the-job injuries? (Why Drug Test). Another study conducted by the National Council reports that ?80 percent of those injured in ?serious? drug-related accidents at work are not the drug abusing employees but non-using co-workers and others? (Why Drug Test). All of these facts relate back to the general duty of the employers to provide a safe work environment for all of their employees. Companies also want to create a safe, productive work environment in order ... ...Spring 2002.      8.) Bryan Jr., Leslie A. ?Drug Testing in the Workplace.? Professional Safety. Oct.      2010.      9.) Pryweller, Joseph. ?Insurers, States, Offer Incentives for Testing.? Plastics News.           18 June 2001.      10.) Professional Services of America. Drug Free Workplace Policy.      11.) Bixby, Michael; Dudley-Beck, Caryn; Cihon, Patrick. The Legal Environment of Business. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2001.      12.) Supreme Court Reporter October Term 2009 Volume 109 A. West Publishing      Company: St. Paul, Minnesota, 2009.      13.) ?Drug Testing in the Workplace.? The American Civil Liberties Union.                http://www.aclu.org/library/pbp5.html. 21 May 2002.      14.) Daniels, Susan. ?Drug-testing Cuts Accident Costs: Study.? National                Underwriter (Property and Casualty/Risk and Benefits Management                Edition v. 101). 23 June 2007.      15.) Elkin, Sam. ?How to Establish a Drug-free Workplace.? Occupational Hazards v. 61. March 2011.      16.) Thatcher, Mike. ?Chemical Warfare.? People Management. 24 Oct. 2010. 17.) ?Why Drug Test Laboratory Corporation of America 2003
Thursday, January 16, 2020
Public Morality Essay
Public morality is often referred to as moral and ethical standards that are enforced in a society, by the law, the police, or social pressure, and applied to public life, to the content of the media and to conduct in public places. Public morality usually involves the regulation of sexual matters, which include prostitution and homosexuality, but it also addresses the issues of nudity, pornography, the acceptability of cohabitation before marriage, and the protection of children (Wikpedia, 2006). It has been suggested by some that there is a growing occurrence of over criminalization in the United States, that our police, prosecutorial, and judicial time, personnel and resources are being preoccupied with an overload in attempts to regulate public morality. The question has been asked as to just how far our government-sanctioned view of morality should intrude into the private lives of its citizens. If we think about history and what is taking place and has taken place not only in the United States but in other countries as well, it is easy to determine that there is not a phenomenon of over criminalization in this country and that, in fact, the exact opposite may be occurring. Government officials both write and enforce the laws of our society. As a consequence government, and those who comprise it, not only intones their own set their own morals and ethics but they are put into the position of judging those of others. But it is fair to ask whether or not true justice is inherent in this process. To address that question, it is first important to realize that justice is more than just law; justice is the product of morals and ethics (Kropotkin, 1923). Three philosophical outlines in particular can be used to demonstrate this correlation. Plato provides perhaps the most enlightening view of the concept of justice. Indeed, his writings serve as the basis for many of the later philosophers which would follow in his footsteps (Dantzig, 1955). In The Republic he gives us the basis of the existence of our modern-day government and the role of that government in ensuring justice. Through his wide-ranging discussion of the ideas of ethics and morality, however, we are able to establish that government is a man-made organization which enforces the desires of the majority, or at least the most influential, for the most part. Under this philosophical framework, therefore, government might not actually ensure justice but only the desires and wishes of the most powerful segment of our society. We can use either ancient or contemporary examples as to the successes and failures of government in providing justice. Given the various scandals and situations which have evolved over the history of the United States alone, the need for our governmental structure cannot be debated. It is our government which determines our actions and reactions. Nor is it debatable, however, that governmental structure, despite all of its attention to the concepts of ethics and morality, sometimes fails. There are numerous instances of such failures of course but there are also many instances of success. Government, therefore, is an integral if not perfect component of ensuring justice for our actions and deeds. John Stewart Mill and Immanuel Kant offer additional guidance on the concept of justice. Although seemingly contradictory, both Kants famous categorical imperative of reason and Mills concept of utilitarianism provide considerable insight to the inherent strengths and weaknesses of our concept of justice. While Kant approaches ethics from the standpoint that appropriate behavior is the result of social determination and that some thing such as right and wrong are simply principles which are inherent in human nature, Mill holds that terms such as good and right are defined on the basis of which behavior provides the greatest benefit to the largest number of people. Kant proposes instead that there is a categorical imperative in reason. All three of these philosophic views are important in understanding the role of the U. S. government in contemporary times. They prompt us to ask whether moral issues are an appropriate venue for governmental intervention. Should our government intrude on our personal behavior when that behavior does not compromise the welfare of others? The answer is that the sum total of our behavior does indeed impact others. That is true even when we are considering such highly controversial issues as sexual choice and reproductive rights. The problem with our government today is that it is backing off of the moral judgments around which it once revolved. It is not that our government is becoming more intrusive from a moral perspective. Indeed it is becoming less intrusive. If we look to other countries for guidance in regard to the appropriate role of the government in morality we can gain a better perspective of what is wrong with our own system. Japan, for example, is one of the most densely populated nations on the earth yet their crime rate is phenomenally low in comparison to other equally developed countries (Wertheimer and Adams, 1994). In fact, although Japan’s population density is approximately thirty times the density which exists in the United States, Japan maintains one of the earth’s lowest crime rates (Wertheimer and Adams, 1994). Its homicides are less than one-fifth of the homicides which occur in the U. S. , U. S. rapes are twenty-two times the number of rapes in Japan, and armed robberies in the U. S. are 114 times that of Japan (Wertheimer and Adams, 1994). Since ancient times the Japanese criminal justice system has placed an emphasis on traditional morality which simply has not been a component of the American system during any point in our history (Cooke, 1991). Although no penal codes existed during earlier Japanese history, there was enforcement of the moral code (Cooke, 1991). That same enforcement continues today both as a result of specific governmental intervention but also, and perhaps more importantly, as a result of societal concentration on acceptable moral behavior. In the U. S. , in comparison, we have backed off this concentration. We prefer to avoid the outcry of the few who are in favor of such moral transgressions as prostitution, gambling, and pornography at the risk of the majority. While we may consider such activities as personal choice, in reality, those choices affect not just the individual making the choice but society as a whole. References Cooke, Melinda W. (1991, Jan 1). Japan: Chapter 7E. The Criminal Justice System. Countries of the World. Dantzig, Tobias. (1955). The Bequest of the Greeks. Charles Scribner and Sons, New York. Kropotkin, P. (1923). Ethics, Origin and Development. New York: The Dial Press. Wertheimer, Linda and Noah Adams. (1994, Aug 18). Japanese and American Crime and Culture Compared. All Things Considered (NPR). Wikipedia. (2006). Definition of Public Morality. Retrieved April 22, 2006, from: http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/publicmorality.
Wednesday, January 8, 2020
Political Perspectives On Political Communities - 2428 Words
Matt Koval Intro to Pol Theory Final Paper 22 July 2016 Question 2: Political Communities During this course, we took a look at and learned about different political theories, aspects, thinkers, and philosophers. A lot of our government and politics today have come from the ideas and topics we learned about this summer. Some of the topics and ideas we learned about closely during this course include, social contract, state of nature, political communities, and justice. I can honestly say that I enjoyed learning more about all of the topics we covered this summer. However, there was one topic in particular that really stood out to me and I enjoyed learning about the most. That topic is political communities: what they are, what it takes for someone to join them, its relationship with the sovereign, and the rights of citizens in a political community. Throughout the course, there were a number of films, thinkers, and their readings that discussed political communities. From what we have learned in this course my understanding of political communities is that they are a community formed by a group of people who have all agreed to give up their individual rights that they naturally have for the good of the community as a whole. In chapter 8 of his Second Treatise of Government, John Locke discusses political communities. Locke starts out this chapter on political communities by saying that men are all naturally free, and the only way someone’s natural rights ofShow MoreRelated The Pros and Cons of Free Trade Essay941 Words  | 4 Pagesgoods between people, communities, and nations is not an innovative economic practice. Nations are however the main element within a free trade agreement. By examining free trade through three different political ideologies: Liberal, Nationalistic, and Marxist approaches, the advantages and disadvantages will become apparent. Theses three ideologies offer the best evaluation of free trade from three different perspectives. The fundamental component for a liberal political economy is the conceptRead MoreHuman Ecology Theory And Community Theory1121 Words  | 5 PagesCommunity Theory In the Macro level of social work, communities are the primary settings for human behavior. Communities are clusters of people who have something in common. A major social work perspective views communities as entities where citizens can organize or be organized in order to address mutual concerns and improve their over-all quality of life. Throughout this paper I will discuss four conceptual perspectives of communities. I will cover the following, Human Ecology, Socio-PsychologicalRead MoreAnalysis Of The Community Is Anomic, By Kirst Ashman861 Words  | 4 PagesWatts Community is anomic, According to Kirst-Ashman (2014) anomic refers to a failed community which is dysfunctional and provides little social support. An anomic community has not or does not take advantage of outside linkages; there is no sense of belonging to the community. Some conditions that illustrate the Watts neighborhood is anomic are the residents of the community live in fear and do not trust each other. Th e community fails to address persistent problems poverty, unemployment, and lackRead MoreRap Culture s Influence On Politics And Society1276 Words  | 6 PagesTracing back to last century, slavery practiced the black community to maintain illiterate, giving them very few opportunities to communicate in any form other than oral tradition of communication. After the Harlem Renaissance in the early 20th century, the black community gained back its voice and the right to access literature. For them, oral communication and contemporary literature became early forms of expression for social and political rhetoric. (Farr, 6) I believe rap fits every definitionRead MoreConstitutional Framers vision and the Washington Community1083 Words  | 5 Pagesâ€Å"Knowledge about the inner life of the governmental community of Washington becomes imperative for understanding the political system of the new nation.†( Young p.108) The Constitutional Framers envisioned a national governme nt that is similar to the concept of Platos cave which is that it would be at a distance and out of sight of the everyday affairs and thoughts of ordinary Americans. The end result, it was anticipated, would be a new form of national and long term thinking by men of prominenceRead MorePhilosophy and Democracy1681 Words  | 7 Pagesperception to political equality (). Dworkin argues for a substantive approach to democratic procedure; in effort to secure an equal distribution of political power to citizens as a whole (9; 117). Dworkin’s consequential approach classifies two types of political decisions: â€Å"choice-sensitive†and â€Å"choice-insensitive†issues (132). Dworkin defines choice-sensitive issues in terms of justice that: â€Å"depends essentially on character and distribution of preferences within the political community†(132).Read MoreChicago School Of Social Ecology Theory1509 Words  | 7 Pagesfrom aforementioned school such as Robert Park and Earnest Burgess propagated that Central Business District (CBD) impacts urban and downtown planning, urban renewal, urban expansions, housing projects, commercial activities, industrialization, community development and urban ecological system. Next, the Berlin School of Urban Ecology also extended the aforementioned theoretical argument when the theorist Herbert Sukopp elaborated on studying the importance of biodiversity patterns, environmentalRead MoreSolving The Consensus And Conflict Model942 Words  | 4 Pagesdistinguish the difference between the two models. According to the textbook â€Å"Criminal Justice Today†the consensus model is defined as a criminal justice perspective that assumes that the system’s components work together harmoniously to achieve the social product we call justice and the conflict model is defined as a criminal justice perspective that assumes that the system’s components function primarily to serve their own interests. According to this theoretical framework, justice is more a productRead MoreAnalysis Of ABC News1058 Words  | 5 PagesOver the course of the research, it also became evident how ABC news and Univision differed further in how they positively or negatively addressed political stories. It appeared substantially evident how ABC news attempts to address political stories positively and negatively; while, Univision deliberately chooses to address political stories negatively. For instance, ABC news negatively covered Trump’s attempt to avoid talking about gun control after the Las Vegas shooting referring to him as â€Å"aRead MoreThe Psychological Impact Of The 2008 Elections1589 Words  | 7 PagesPsychological Impact of the 2008 Elections State and local elections create a series of moments that are sometimes stressful for the voters who are faced with the decision making process that could have a major impact on their lives and their communities. Selecting and voting for the candidate that holds the values, qualities and opinions that a voter shares is often not so clear cut. Presidential elections have the potential for creating even greater stress and anxiety due to the power and control
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)